Josh Gad Is Nonetheless Mortified Over Disney Making Magnificence and the Beast’s ‘Completely Homosexual Second’ a Large Deal

We’ve come a great distance since Disney’s first “exclusively gay moment” when the studio made an enormous to-do about LeFou in its live-action Magnificence and the Beast—principally in a depressingly big ol’ circle, now we’re again to the Home of Mouse cutting LGBTQ+ storylines out of its media to enchantment to conservative dad and mom once more. However now practically eight years later, the star on the heart of that back-patting furor is talking out on simply how shocked he was to see Disney blow it out of proportion.

“I for one actually didn’t precisely really feel like LeFou was who the queer group had been wistfully ready for,” Josh Gad mentioned of his position as LeFou within the movie, writing in his new memoir In Gad We Belief (through Entertainment Weekly). “I can’t fairly think about a Satisfaction celebration in honor of the ‘cinematic watershed second’ involving a quasi-villainous Disney sidekick dancing with a person for half a second. I imply, if I had been homosexual, I’m certain I’d be pissed.”

And but, that’s basically what Disney tried to do again in 2017, when Magnificence and the Beast‘s director Invoice Condon teased the second—the place LeFou dances with a male companion throughout a climactic celebratory sequence within the movie—into a serious step for Disney’s on-screen LGBTQ+ efforts, describing it (now infamously) as an “completely homosexual second” in an interview with Attitude. However in line with Gad, the second had barely been mentioned on-set as an explicitly deliberate second, and was by no means supposed to be seen as greater than a quiet nod.

“As a result of I used to be a aspect character, I didn’t need to all of a sudden throw the load of sexuality on this character that by no means was driving the movie,” Gad writes. “However the second (as described to me) appeared innocent sufficient—a enjoyable blink-and-you’ll-miss-it little beat.”

As a substitute, Condon’s framing of the second turned it right into a media firestorm, with bigots livid on the considered two males dancing collectively (a factor that’s actually by no means occurred in a Disney film earlier than) and the studio itself to eagerly capitalize on with the ability to have a tiny speck of queer illustration on the large display screen. It wouldn’t be the primary time both over the following few years, as Disney seemingly managed to regurgitate that it was doing its “first brazenly homosexual character” for a number of press cycles, even because the studio and its main subsidiaries barely took steps with queer characters and their presence past these throwaway acknowledgements.

“Had the viewers outlined it as a candy completely homosexual second, I’d have been delighted,” Gad concludes, “however the second we pointed it out and seemingly congratulated ourselves, we had invited hell and fury.”

The extra issues change, the extra they keep the identical—though now Disney is inviting the hell and fury for its own cowardice, greater than the rest.

Need extra io9 information? Try when to count on the newest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s subsequent for the DC Universe on film and TV, and every thing you want to find out about the way forward for Doctor Who.